4.1 Article

Metal extraction by sulfur-containing symmetrically-substituted bisphosphonic acids. Part I. P,P '-di(2-ethylhexyl) methylenebisthio-phosphonic acid

期刊

SOLVENT EXTRACTION AND ION EXCHANGE
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 331-346

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07366290600646988

关键词

bisthiophosphonic acids; bisphosphonates; partial esters; lanthanide; actinide separations; aggregation; metal extraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P,P'-dialkyl methylenebisphosphonic acids are powerful metal extraction reagents exhibiting strong affinity for a variety of metal ions, especially lanthanides and actinides. While the affinity of gem -bisphosphonic acids is generally high for most metal ions because of their relative high acidity and ability to form six-member chelate rings, the selectivity often is low. Thus, a strategy of incorporating soft-donor atoms such as sulfur into gem-bisphosphonic acids has been adopted to obtain enhanced metal selectivity while retaining high extraction efficiency. To this end a new class of sulfur-containing gem -bisphosphonic acid solvent extraction reagents was designed, synthesized, and evaluated for heavy element separations. Specifically, the novel sulfur-containing P,P'-di(2-ethylhexyl) methylenebisthiophosphonic acid, H2DEH[MBTP], was synthesized, characterized and its aggregation, metal extraction and acid-base behavior assessed. Vapor phase osmometry measurements indicate that H 2 DEH[MBTP] is less aggregated than its P,P'-di(2-ethylhexyl) methylenebisphosphonic acid analogue, H2DEH[MBP], existing in toluene primarily as an equilibrium mixture of monomer and dimer in the concentration range studied. The acid dependency data for the extraction of Am3+ and Eu3+ from aqueous perchlorate solutions by H-2 DEH[MBTP] in o-xylene exhibit slopes close to -3 at low acidity, consistent with extraction of a trivalent metal ion. The extractant dependency data exhibit pH dependent slopes, suggesting different stoichiometry of metal extraction under different acidities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据