4.2 Article

CBT intensity and outcome for panic disorder in a primary care setting

期刊

BEHAVIOR THERAPY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 112-119

出版社

ASSOC ADV BEHAVIOR THERAPY
DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2005.05.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH57835, MH57858, MH58915, MH64122, MH065324] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K24MH065324, U01MH057858, K24MH064122, R01MH057835, U01MH057835, U01MH058915, R01MH058915, R01MH057858] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

hybrid efficacy-effectiveness design in which participants (n = 91/93) were retained in the study regardless of whether or not they received treatment enabled evaluation of CBT intensity in relation to panic disorder in the primary care setting. CBT intensity was operationalized as number of cognitive-behavioral therapy sessions, number of follow-up booster phone calls, and secondarily, as number of cognitive behavioral coping and exposure strategies. Baseline psychosocial and demographic predictors of CBT intensity were analyzed first. Severity of anxiety sensitivity predicted number of cognitive behavioral sessions, but no baseline variables predicted number of follow-up booster phone calls or number of coping and exposure strategies. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to evaluate the degree to which treatment intensity predicted 3-month and 12-month outcomes (anxiety sensitivity, phobic avoidance, depressive symptoms, disability, and medical and mental health functioning) after controlling for potential confounding baseline variables. Number of cognitive behavioral therapy sessions predicted lower anxiety sensitivity at 3 and 12 months, and number of follow-up booster phone calls predicted lower anxiety sensitivity, less phobic avoidance, and less depression at 12 months. These findings indicate that dose of psychotherapy was an important predictor of outcome. The significance of follow-up booster phone contact is discussed as an index of continued self-management of panic and anxiety following acute treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据