4.5 Article

Pulp Revascularization of Immature Dog Teeth with Apical Periodontitis Using Triantibiotic Paste and Platelet-rich Plasma: A Radiographic Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 1299-1304

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.002

关键词

Apical negative pressure irrigation; immature tooth; mineral trioxide aggregate; platelet-rich plasma; pulp regeneration; pulp revascularization; scaffold; triantibiotic paste

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: This study evaluates radiographically the efficacy of 4 revascularization protocols in necrotic-infected immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis (AP). Methods: Forty double-rooted immature premolar teeth from 4 female beagle dogs aged 5 months were used. Four teeth were left untouched as negative controls; the other 36 teeth were infected to develop pulp necrosis and AP following different treatment protocols. Four teeth were left untreated and assigned to the positive control group, and the last 28 teeth were randomly assigned into 4 experimental groups of 8 teeth: Al, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) + a blood clot; A2, NaOCl+ platelet-rich plasma (PRP); B1, NaOCl+ modified triantibiotic paste (mTAP) + a blood clot; and B2, NaOCl + mTAP + PRP. Teeth were monitored radiographically for 6 months regarding healing of periapical radiolucencies, thickening of the dentinal walls, and apical closure of roots. Results: Significant differences (P < .05) between the 4 groups were evident in the percentage of teeth showing improvement of periapical radiolucencies (62.5%), continued radiographic thickening of radicular walls (53.1%), radiographic apical closure (43.8%), and deposition of hard tissue on radicular dentin walls (53.1%). Group B2 showed maximal improvement in the 3 variables assessed (P < .05). Group Al showed the minimum percentages in the 3 parameters assessed (P < .05). Conclusions: These results suggest that an intracanal dressing of mTAP and the use of PRP as scaffold improves the success rate of the revascularization procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据