4.5 Article

Auxin Immunolocalization Implicates Vesicular Neurotransmitter-Like Mode of Polar Auxin Transport in Root Apices

期刊

PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR
卷 1, 期 3, 页码 122-133

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/psb.1.3.2759

关键词

actin; auxin; maize; secretion; vesicles; neurotransmitter

资金

  1. Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR, Cologne, Germany) [50WB 0434]
  2. European Space Agency (ESA-ESTEC Noordwijk, The Netherlands) [AO-99-098]
  3. EC Research Training Networks (Brussels, Belgium) [HPRN-CT-2002-00265]
  4. Slovak Academy of Sciences (Grant Ageny VEGA, Bratislava, Slovakia) [2/5085/25]
  5. [MSM6198969216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunolocalization of auxin using a new specific antibody revealed, besides the expected diffuse cytoplasmic signal, enrichments of auxin at end-poles (cross-walls), within endosomes and within nuclei of those root apex cells which accumulate abundant F-actin at their end-poles. In Brefeldin A (BFA) treated roots, a strong auxin signal was scored within BFA-induced compartments of cells having abundant actin and auxin at their end-poles, as well as within adjacent endosomes, but not in other root cells. Importantly, several types of polar auxin transport (PAT) inhibitors exert similar inhibitory effects on endocytosis, vesicle recycling, and on the enrichments of F-actin at the end-poles. These findings indicate that auxin is transported across F-actin-enriched end-poles (synapses) via neurotransmitter-like secretion. This new concept finds genetic support from the sema-phore1, rum1 and rum1/lrt1 mutants of maize which are impaired in PAT, endocytosis and vesicle recycling, as well as in recruitment of F-actin and auxin to the auxin transporting end-poles. Although PIN1 localizes abundantly to the end-poles, and they also fail to support the formation of in these mutants affected in PAT, auxin and F-actin are depleted from their end-poles which also fail to support formation of the large BFA-induced compartments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据