Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: comparison of three estimation methods

Aims. - Motor threshold (MT) is an important parameter for the practice of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Our goat was to compare three methods to estimate MT in a clinical setting. Methods. - Comparison of three MT estimation algorithms: 1) the Rossini-Rothwell method consists in lowering stimulus intensity until only five positive responses out of 10 trials are recorded, defining MT; 2) the Mills-Nithi method considers the MT as the mean of an upper threshold (10 positive out of 10 trials) and a lower threshold (0 out of 10 trials); 3) the supervised parametric method estimates the MT by fitting (mathematically and graphically) a sigmoid function on raw data obtained by stimulation at variable intensities. Six MT estimations (two per method) were recorded in a single session in 10 healthy subjects. Results. - The within-subject variation of MT (expressed as % of the mean MT +/- standard deviation) during a single session was of 8.5 +/- 7.2% for the Rossini-Rothwell method, 8.7 +/- 5.7% for the Mills-Nithi method and 9.5 +/- 4.0% for the supervised parametric method. No significant differences in variability of MT estimation were found between the methods, but the Rossini-Rothwell method was significantly shorter (half the number of stimuli compared to the two other methods). Conclusion. - In our setting, Rossini-Rothwelt method was superior to the two other methods. The variability of MT estimation measured in our study is important, yet acceptable for clinical applications. However, this variability can be a source of considerable errors in excitability studies and should be a focus of future research. (c) 2006 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.