3.8 Article

Cancer Therapy-Induced Residual Bone Marrow Injury: Mechanisms of Induction and Implication for Therapy

期刊

CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 271-279

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/157339406777934717

关键词

Ionizing radiation; chemotherapy; myelosuppression; hematopoietic stem cells; senescence

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA102558, R01CA86688, GC-3319-05-4498CM]
  2. Department of Defense through the Hollings Cancer Center
  3. Abney Foundation Scholarship
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA086860, R01CA102558] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone marrow (BM) suppression is an important dose-limiting side effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer. Although acute myelosuppression is an immediate concern for patients undergoing cancer therapy, its management has been improved significantly in recent years by the use of various hematopoietic growth factors. However, many patients receiving chemotherapy and/or ionizing radiation (IR) also develop residual (or long-term) BM injury (a sustained decrease in HSC reserves due to an impairment in HSC self-renewal) after the recovery from acute myelosuppression. Unlike acute myelosuppression, residual BM injury is latent and long lasting and shows little tendency for recovery. Following additional hematopoietic stress such as subsequent cycles of consolidation cancer treatment or autologous BM transplantation, residual BM injury can deteriorate to become a hypoplastic or myelodysplastic syndrome. This article review some of the new developments in elucidating the cellular and molecular mechanisms whereby chemotherapy and radiotherapy cause residual BM injury. Particularly, we discuss the role of induction of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) senescence via the p53-p21(Cip1/ Waf1) and/or p16(Ink4a)-RB pathways in the induction of the injury and the therapeutic potential of molecularly targeting these pathways for amelioration of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced long-term BM toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据