4.8 Article

Integrative Genomic Analyses of Sporadic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Define Disease Subtypes and Potential New Therapeutic Targets

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 112-121

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1698

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. NIH [CA104838]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. NIH R01 [CA135509]
  5. Abramson Cancer Center
  6. Pennsylvania Department of Health
  7. Abramson Cancer Center [5P30CA016520]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common type of adult kidney cancer, is often associated with genomic copy number aberrations on chromosomes 3p and 5q. Aberrations on chromosome 3p are associated with inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene von-Hippel Lindau (VHL), which activates the hypoxia-inducible factors HIF1 alpha and HIF2 alpha. In contrast, ccRCC genes on chromosome 5q remain to be defined. In this study, we conducted an integrated analysis of high-density copy number and gene expression data for 54 sporadic ccRCC tumors that identified the secreted glycoprotein STC2 (stanniocalcin 2) and the proteoglycan VCAN (versican) as potential 5q oncogenes in ccRCCs. In functional assays, STC2 and VCAN each promoted tumorigenesis by inhibiting cell death. Using the same approach, we also investigated the two VHL-deficient subtypes of ccRCC, which express both HIF1 alpha and HIF2 alpha (H1H2) or only HIF2 alpha (H2). This analysis revealed a distinct pattern of genomic aberrations in each group, with the H1H2 group displaying, on average, a more aberrant genome than the H2 group. Together our findings provide a significant advance in understanding ccRCCs by offering a molecular definition of two subtypes with distinct characteristics as well as two potential chromosome 5q oncogenes, the overexpression of which is sufficient to promote tumorigenesis by limiting cell death. Cancer Res; 72(1); 112-21. (C) 2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据