4.5 Review

Recent advances in central congenital hypothyroidism

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 227, 期 3, 页码 R51-R71

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/JOE-15-0341

关键词

congenital hypothyroidism; central hypothyroidism; hypopituitarism; thyrotropin releasing hormone

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [100585/Z/12/Z, 095564/Z/11/Z]
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12012/5/B] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10198, NF-SI-0514-10176] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Central congenital hypothyroidism (CCH) may occur in isolation, or more frequently in combination with additional pituitary hormone deficits with or without associated extrapituitary abnormalities. Although uncommon, it may be more prevalent than previously thought, affecting up to 1: 16 000 neonates in the Netherlands. Since TSH is not elevated, CCH will evade diagnosis in primary, TSH-based, CH screening programs and delayed detection may result in neurodevelopmental delay due to untreated neonatal hypothyroidism. Alternatively, coexisting growth hormones or ACTH deficiency may pose additional risks, such as life threatening hypoglycaemia. Genetic ascertainment is possible in a minority of cases and reveals mutations in genes controlling the TSH biosynthetic pathway (TSHB, TRHR, IGSF1) in isolated TSH deficiency, or early (HESX1, LHX3, LHX4, SOX3, OTX2) or late (PROP1, POU1F1) pituitary transcription factors in combined hormone deficits. Since TSH cannot be used as an indicator of euthyroidism, adequacy of treatment can be difficult to monitor due to a paucity of alternative biomarkers. This review will summarize the normal physiology of pituitary development and the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, then describe known genetic causes of isolated central hypothyroidism and combined pituitary hormone deficits associated with TSH deficiency. Difficulties in diagnosis and management of these conditions will then be discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据