4.7 Article

Forkhead box protein P1 expression in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas predicts poor prognosis and transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 16, 页码 2490-2497

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6150

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Gene expression profiling studies have reported upregulated mBNA expression of forkhead box protein P1 (FOXP1) in response to normal B-cell activation and high expression in a poor prognosis subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Recently, it was also found that FOXP1 rearrangements and expression of its protein occur in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. In this study, we investigated FOXP1 expression in its relationship to morphology, genetic features, and prognosis in a series of 70 MALT lymphomas. Patients and Methods All samples were morphologically reviewed and stained for FOXP1. Presence of structural and/or numeric aberrations of the FOXP1, BCL10, and MALT1 genes was investigated. For all patients, a complete clinical data set was collected. Results We detected nuclear expression of FOXP1 in 20 of the 70 MALT lymphomas (nine of them featuring structural or numeric aberrations of the FOXP1 locus). FOXP1 positivity was confined to MALT lymphomas with poor clinical outcome (with impact of FOXP1 expression on relapse rate and disease-free survival). It was also found that MALT lymphomas with strong FOXP1 expression are at risk of transforming into an aggressive DLBCL of nongerminal center phenotype if they feature, in addition, a polymorphic histology and the presence of trisomy 3 and 18. Conclusion The data presented show that FOXP1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in MALT lymphomas. The data also support the hypothesis that a subgroup of nongerminal center DLBCLs (those marked by FOXP1 expression and trisomy 3 and 18) might represent a large-cell variant of MALT lymphomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据