4.6 Article

Electron beam charging of insulators: A self-consistent flight-drift model

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 99, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2201851

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron beam irradiation and the self-consistent charge transport in bulk insulating samples are described by means of a new flight-drift model and an iterative computer simulation. Ballistic secondary electron and hole transport is followed by electron and hole drifts, their possible recombination and/or trapping in shallow and deep traps. The trap capture cross sections are the Poole-Frenkel-type temperature and field dependent. As a main result the spatial distributions of currents j(x,t), charges rho(x,t), the field F(x,t), and the potential slope V(x,t) are obtained in a self-consistent procedure as well as the time-dependent secondary electron emission rate sigma(t) and the surface potential V-0(t). For bulk insulating samples the time-dependent distributions approach the final stationary state with j(x,t)=const=0 and sigma=1. Especially for low electron beam energies E-0 < 4 keV the incorporation of mainly positive charges can be controlled by the potential V-G of a vacuum grid in front of the target surface. For high beam energies E-0=10, 20, and 30 keV high negative surface potentials V-0=-4, -14, and -24 kV are obtained, respectively. Besides open nonconductive samples also positive ion-covered samples and targets with a conducting and grounded layer (metal or carbon) on the surface have been considered as used in environmental scanning electron microscopy and common SEM in order to prevent charging. Indeed, the potential distributions V(x) are considerably small in magnitude and do not affect the incident electron beam neither by retarding field effects in front of the surface nor within the bulk insulating sample. Thus the spatial scattering and excitation distributions are almost not affected. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据