4.5 Article

In vivo profiling of focal cortical dysplasia on high-resolution MRI with computational models

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 134-142

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00379.x

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; image analysis; focal cortical dysplasia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: On MRI, focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is characterized by a combination of increased cortical thickness, hyperintense signal within the dysplastic lesion, and blurred transition between gray and white matter (GM-WM). The visual identification of these abnormal characteristics may be difficult, and it is unclear to what degree these features occur among different FCD lesions. Our purpose was to investigate the pattern of occurrence of abnormal MRI characteristics in FCD by using a set of computational models and to generate quantitative lesion profiling. Methods: A set of voxel-wise operators was applied to high-resolution 3D T-1-weighted MRI in 23 patients with histologically proven FCD and 39 healthy controls, creating maps of GM thickness, maps of relative intensity highlighting areas with hyperintense signal, and maps of gradient magnitude modeling the GM-WM transition. All FCD lesions were segmented manually on the T-1-weighted MRI. Results: FCD volumes ranged from 734 mm(3) to 80,726 mm(3) (mean, 8,629 mm(3)+/- 16,238). The manually segmented FCD lesions were used to estimate features in the lesional area and to determine possible local variations of each feature by means of a histogram. In 78% of the patients, FCD lesions were characterized by simultaneous GM thickening, hyperintense signal, and blurring of the GM-WM transition. Moreover, in all patients, the FCD lesion had at least two of these three characteristics. Conclusions: The three features occurred regardless of the lesion volume, and they characterized not only large FCD lesions, but also subtle ones that had been overlooked by conventional radiologic inspection before surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据