4.6 Review

Cytomegalovirus disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.03.005

关键词

cytomegalovirus; herpesviruses; human immunodeficiency virus; diagnosis; opportunistic infections; HAART

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytornegalovirus (CMV) infection was one of the most important opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), i.e. the combination of at least three antiretroviral drugs of different classes. Thereafter, life expectancy and quality of life increased dramatically with the persistent suppression of HIV viremia and a significant reduction in incidence of CMV disease. Nevertheless, evidence for a multitude of direct and indirect effects of CMV on HIV progression is accumulating. Even in the era of HAART, a considerable number of HIV-infected patients have a CD4 cell count below <100mm(-3), which involves a high risk for CMV disease. The focus of the present review is on interpretation of test results, their predictive value for CMV disease, and guidance for the rational use of diagnostic assays in HIV-infected patients. Identification of patients at immediate risk for CMV disease may be accomplished by detection of CMV-DNA in leucocytes or plasma. Evidence is growing that CMV genotypes may be also relevant for the risk of CMV disease. Diagnosis of CMV disease requires in most instances demonstration of virus in biopsy specimen from the affected organ because presence of CMV in blood may not be causally related to symptoms observed. Clinical symptoms and patient characteristics are essential in the interpretation of laboratory test results and may guide the rational collection of clinical specimen and use of laboratory assays. As a consequence, a reliable diagnosis of CMV disease and early identification of patients at high risk for CMV disease requires an integrated interpretation of clinical and virological information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据