4.6 Article

Selective extraction and preconcentration of trace lead(II) in medicinal plant-based ionic liquid hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction system using dicyclohexyl-18-crown-6 as membrane carrier

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 2339-2346

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ay02625j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470434, 21406090, 21206059, 21407058]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131258]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20133227120006]
  4. Science Foundation of Jiangsu Entry-exit Inspection Quarantine Bureau [2014KJ33]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel three-phase ionic liquid hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (IL-HF-LPME) system was used for the selective extraction and preconcentration of Pb(II) from medicinal plants. Green solvent ionic liquid 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([HMIM]PF6) containing dicyclohexyl-18-crown-6 (DCH18C6) was used as membrane phase immobilized in the hollow fiber pores. Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid was used as stripping agent that can form water-soluble complex with Pb(II) in the lumen of the hollow fiber. After extraction, the acceptor solution was directly injected into a graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometer for analysis. A Box-Behnken design was used to study the influence of DCH18C6 concentration, extraction time and pH on the extraction efficiency. Under the optimized conditions, an enrichment factor of 199 and a limit of detection of 0.008 ng mL(-1) were obtained. The calibration curve was linear in the range of 0.05-0.5 ng mL(-1) (R = 0.999). Moreover, the obtained results show that DCH18C6 can selectively and efficiently transport Pb(II) from the aqueous phase containing different concentrations of heavy metal ions (Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Fe2+, Zn2+). The proposed method was successfully applied to determination of Pb(II) in medicinal plants with satisfactory recoveries in the range of 94-102%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据