4.8 Article

FOXO3 Encodes a Carcinogen-Activated Transcription Factor Frequently Deleted in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 70, 期 15, 页码 6205-6215

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4008

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [P30 AG19610]
  2. Arizona Department of Health Services [211002]
  3. Arizona Biomedical Research Commission [4001, 0011, 05-901, 1001]
  4. Prescott Family Initiative of the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  5. Joan Scarangello Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The FOXO family of transcription factors elicits cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and resistance to various physiologic and pathologic stresses relevant to sporadic cancer, such as DNA damage and oxidative stress. Although implicated as tumor suppressors, FOXO genetic inactivation has not been observed in human cancer. In an investigation of the two major types of non-small cell lung cancer, here, we identify the FOXO3 gene as a novel target of deletion in human lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). Biallelic or homozygous deletion (HD) of FOXO3 was detected in 8 of 33 (24.2%) mostly early-stage LAC of smokers. Another 60.6% of these tumors had losses of FOXO3 not reaching the level of HD (hereafter referred to as sub-HD). In contrast, no HD of FOXO3 was observed in 19 lung squamous cell carcinoma. Consistent with the deletion of FOXO3 were corresponding decreases in its mRNA and protein levels in LAC. The potential role of FOXO3 loss in LAC was also investigated. The carcinogen (+)-anti-7,8-dihydroxy-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a] pyrene (BPDE) is strongly implicated as a cause of human lung cancer. Here, we show that FOXO3a is functionally activated and augments the level of caspase-dependent apoptosis in cells exposed to this DNA-damaging carcinogen. These results implicate FOXO3 as a suppressor of LAC carcinogenesis, a role frequently lost through gene deletion. Cancer Res; 70(15); 6205-15. (C) 2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据