4.8 Article

A Unique Pharmacophore for Activation of the Nuclear Orphan Receptor Nur77 In vivo and In vitro

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 70, 期 9, 页码 3628-3637

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3160

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [30630070, 20672089, 30921005]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology in China [2007CB914402, 2006AA09Z410]
  3. Ministry of Education [706036]
  4. Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2007Y0033]
  5. Science Planning Program of Fujian Province [2009J1010]
  6. Innovative Research Team in Science and Technology (University) in Fujian Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nur77 is a steroid orphan receptor that plays a critical role in regulating proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, including acting as a switch for Bcl-2 function. We previously reported that the octaketide cytosporone B (Csn-B) is a natural agonist for Nur77. In this study, we synthesized a series of Csn-B analogues and performed a structure-activity analysis that suggested criteria for the development of a unique pharmacophore to activate Nur77. The components of the pharmacophore necessary for binding Nur77 included the benzene ring, the phenolic hydroxyl group, and the acyl chain of the Csn-B scaffold, whereas the key feature for activating the biological function of Nur77 was the ester group. Csn-B analogues that bound Nur77 tightly not only stimulated its transactivation activity but also initiated mitochondrial apoptosis by means of novel crosstalk between Nur77 and BRE, an antiapoptotic protein regulated at the transcriptional level. Notably, the derivative n-amyl 2-[3,5-dihydroxy-2-(1-nonanoyl)phenyl] acetate exhibited greater antitumor activity in vivo than its parent compounds, highlighting particular interest in this compound. Our findings describe a pathway for rational design of Csn-B-derived Nur77 agonists as a new class of potent and effective antitumor agents. Cancer Res; 70(9); 3628-37. (C) 2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据