4.3 Article

A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT INTERVENTION FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC NONCANCER PAIN

期刊

JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 974-983

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.03.004

关键词

chronic noncancer pain; frequent visitors; emergency departments

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [BAA 2011-N-13277, CDC 200-2011-39651]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Emergency Departments (EDs) are beginning to notify their physicians of patients reporting chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) who frequent EDs, and are suggesting that the physicians not prescribe opioids to these patients. Objectives: We hypothesized that this intervention would reduce both the number of opioids prescribed to these patients by their ED physicians and the number of these patients' return visits to the ED. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of this intervention in 13 electronically linked EDs. Patients eligible for the study were characterized by CNCP, lacked evidence of sickle cell anemia and suicide ideation, and made frequent (>10) visits to the EDs over a 12-month period. We randomly assigned 411 of these patients to either an intervention group or a control group. Our intervention comprised both an alert placed in eligible patients' medical files and letters sent to the patients and their community-based providers. The alert suggested that physicians decline requests for opioid analgesic prescriptions and instead refer these patients to community-based providers to manage their ongoing pain. Results: During the 12 months after randomization, patients in the intervention and control groups averaged 11.9 and 16.6 return visits, and received prescriptions for opioids on 16% and 26% of those visits, respectively. Altogether, patients in the intervention group made 1033 fewer return visits to the EDs in the follow-up year than those in the control group. Conclusion: This intervention constitutes a promising practice that EDs should consider to reduce the number of visits made by frequent visitors with CNCP. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据