4.8 Article

Silencing of SPRY1 Triggers Complete Regression of Rhabdomyosarcoma Tumors Carrying a Mutated RAS Gene

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 762-771

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2532

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds (Dutch Cancer Society fund) [2001-2558]
  2. Stichting Kindergeneeskundig Kankeronderzoek (Childhood Cancer Fund)
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Venigrant [016.056.165]
  4. Ter Meulen Fund (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RAS oncogenes are among the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer, but effective strategies for therapeutic inhibition of the RAS pathway have been elusive. Sprouty1 (SPRY1) is an upstream antagonist of RAS that is activated by extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK), providing a negative feedback loop for RAS signaling, and other evidence suggests that SPRY1 may have a tumor suppressor function. Studies of RAS status in the human childhood tumor rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) indicated mutations in approximately half of the tumors of the embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma subtype (ERMS) but not the alveolar subtype (ARMS). ERMS tumors also showed overexpression of SPRY1, which was indeed upregulated by mutant RAS. However, we found that, in the presence of mutant RAS, the function of SPRY1 was changed from an antagonist to an agonist of RAS signaling. Thus, SPRY1 supported formation of activated ERK and mitogen-activated protein/ERK kinase and was essential for ERMS cell proliferation and survival. Conversely, silencing of SPRY1 in ERMS cells (but not ARMS cells) abolished their tumorigenicity in mice. Moreover, silencing of SPRY1 caused regression of established ERMS tumors (but not ARMS tumors) formed in xenograft settings. Our findings argue that SPRY1 inhibition can offer a therapeutic strategy to treat childhood RMS and possibly other tumors carrying oncogenic RAS mutations. Cancer Res; 70(2); 762-71. (C)2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据