4.5 Article

The short-lived Mat alpha 2 transcriptional repressor is protected from degradation in vivo by interactions with its corepressors Tup1 and Ssn6

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 371-380

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.1.371-380.2006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM046904, R37GM046904] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R37 GM046904, GM46904, R01 GM046904] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mat alpha 2 (alpha 2) protein is a transcriptional repressor necessary for the proper expression of cell type-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Like many transcription factors, alpha 2 is rapidly degraded in vivo by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. At least two different ubiquitin-dependent pathways target alpha 2 for destruction, one of which recognizes the well-characterized Deg1 degradation determinant near the N terminus of the protein. Here we report that the alpha 2 corepressors Tup1 and Ssn6 modify the in vivo degradation rate of alpha 2. Tup1 modulates the metabolic stability of alpha 2 by directly binding to the Deg1-containing region of the protein. TUP1 overexpression specifically stabilizes Deg1-containing proteins but not other substrates of the same ubiquitination enzymes that recognize Deg1. Point mutations in both alpha 2 and Tup1 that compromise the alpha 2-Tup1 binding interaction disrupt the ability of Tup1 to stabilize Deg1 proteins. The physical association between Tup1 and alpha 2 competes with the ubiquitination machinery for access to the Deg1 signal. Finally, we observe that overproduction of both Tup1 and Ssn6, but not either alone, strongly stabilizes the endogenous alpha 2 protein. From these results, we propose that the fraction of alpha 2 found in active regulatory complexes with Tup1 and Ssn6 is spared from rapid proteolytic destruction and is stabilized relative to the uncomplexed pool of the protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据