4.7 Article

Clinical and pathological characterization of progressive aphasia

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 156-165

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.20700

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U105559861, MC_U105579219] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U105579219, MC_U105559861] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 64445] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [P50MH064445] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The clinical and neuropathological categorization of patients presenting with progressive aphasia is an area of controversy. This study aimed to characterize a large group of progressive aphasic patients from a single center (n = 38), first clinically by case note review, and then pathologically. Metho Hierarchical cluster analysis of the cases according to their clinical language deficits was used to establish an unbiased, data-driven classification. Results. This analysis revealed two groups of cases corresponding to the syndromes of progressive nonfluent aphasia (n = 23) and semantic dementia (n = 15). Postmortem analysis showed a majority in both groups of pathologies from the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: the most frequent were non-Alzheimer's disease (AD) tauopathy in the nonfluent cases (10 of 23) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions in the fluent cases (8 of 15). Despite rigorous exclusion of cases with clinically significant memory deficits or other cognitive impairments, the pathology of AD was present in approximately one third of each group (overall 12 of 38), although often with an atypical neuroanatomical distribution. Intenpretation: Progressive aphasia is best seen as a composite of two conditions, on both clinical and pathological levels: progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据