4.5 Article

Nox2 and Rac1 regulate H2O2-dependent recruitment of TRAF6 to endosomal interleukin-1 receptor complexes

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 140-154

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.1.140-154.2006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK067928, P30DK054759, R01DK051315] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK51315, DK067928, R01 DK051315, P30 DK054759, R01 DK067928, P30 DK54759] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by NADPH oxidases (Nox) have been implicated in the regulation of signal transduction. However, the cellular mechanisms that link Nox activation with plasma membrane receptor signaling remain poorly defined. We have found that Nox2-derived ROS influence the formation of an active interleukin-I (IL-1) receptor complex in the endosomal compartment by directing the H2O2-dependent binding of TRAF6 to the IL-1R1/MyD88 complex. Clearance of both superoxide and H2O2 from within the endosomal compartment significantly abrogated IL-1 beta-dependent IKK and NF-kappa B activation. MyD88-dependent endocytosis of IL-1R1 following IL-1 beta binding was required for the redox-dependent formation of an active endosomal receptor complex competent for IKK and NF-kappa B activation. Small interfering RNAs to either MyD88 or Rac1 inhibited IL-1 beta induction of endosomal superoxide and NF-kappa B activation. However, MyD88 and Rac1 appear to be recruited independently to IL-IR1 following ligand stimulation. In this context, MyD88 binding was required for inducing endocytosis of IL-IR1 following ligand binding, while Rac1 facilitated the recruitment of Nox2 into the endosomal compartment and subsequent redox-dependent recruitment of TRAF6 to the MyD88/1L-1R1 complex. The identification of Nox-active endosomes helps explain how subcellular compartmentalization of redox signals can be used to direct receptor activation from the plasma membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据