4.5 Article

Organelle transport along microtubules in Xenopus melanophores: Evidence for cooperation between multiple motors

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 318-327

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.067843

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5 P41-RR03155, P41 RR003155] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM052111, GM-52111] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR003155] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM052111, R55GM052111] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xenopus melanophores have pigment organelles or melanosomes which, in response to hormones, disperse in the cytoplasm or aggregate in the perinuclear region. Melanosomes are transported by microtubule motors, kinesin-2 and cytoplasmic dynein, and an actin motor, myosin-V. We explored the regulation of melanosome transport along microtubules in vivo by using a new fast-tracking routine, which determines the melanosome position every 10 ms with 2-nm precision. The velocity distribution of melanosomes transported by cytoplasmic dynein or kinesin-2 under conditions of aggregation and dispersion presented several peaks and could not befit with a single Gaussian function. We postulated that the melanosome velocity depends linearly on the number of active motors. According to this model, one to three dynein molecules transport each melanosome in the minus-end direction. The transport in the plus-end direction is mainly driven by one to two copies of kinesin-2. The number of dyneins transporting a melanosome increases during aggregation, whereas the number of active kinesin-2 stays the same during aggregation and dispersion. Thus, the number of active dynein molecules regulates the net direction of melanosome transport. The model also shows that multiple motors of the same polarity cooperate during the melanosome transport, whereas motors of opposite polarity do not compete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据