3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Interaction between muscle and bone

期刊

HORMONE RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 73-78

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000096626

关键词

bone; bone defect; bone densitometry; mechanostat; muscle; muscle force

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone densitometric data are often difficult to interpret in children and adolescents because of large inter- and intraindividual variations in bone size. Here, we propose a functional approach to bone densitometry that addresses two questions. Is bone strength normally adapted to the largest physiological loads, that is muscle force? Is muscle force adequate for body size? The theoretical background for this approach is provided by the mechanostat theory, which proposes that bones adapt their strength to keep the strain caused by physiological loads close to a set point. Because the largest physiological loads are caused by muscle contractions, there should be a close relationship between bone strength and muscle force or size. The proposed two-step diagnostic algorithm requires a measure of muscle force or size and a measure of bone mineral content at a corresponding location. The results can be combined into four diagnostic groups. In the first situation, muscle force or size is adequate for height. If the skeleton is adapted normally to the muscle system, the result is interpreted as 'normal'.. If it is lower than expected for muscle force or size, a 'primary bone defect' is diagnosed. In the second situation, muscle force or size is too low for height. Even if the skeleton is adapted adequately to the decreased mechanical challenge, this means that bone mass, and presumably strength, are still too low for body height. Therefore, a 'secondary bone defect' is diagnosed. Finally, if both muscle force or size and the skeleton are inadequately adapted, a 'mixed bone defect' is diagnosed. It is hoped that the more detailed insights thus gained could help to devise targeted strategies for the prevention and treatment of paediatric bone diseases. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据