4.5 Article

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase-derived nitric oxide inhibits neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus by down-regulating cyclic AMP response element binding protein phosphorylation

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 827-836

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.04.032

关键词

7-nitroindazole; hippocampus; proliferation; MK-801; NMDA receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase, the major nitric oxide synthase isoform in the mammalian brain, is implicated in some developmental processes, including neuronal survival, precursor proliferation and differentiation. However, reports about the role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus are conflicting. Here we show that 5-bromodeoxyuridine-labeled dividing progenitor cells in the dentate gyrus were significantly increased in mice receiving 7-nitroindazole, a selective neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, and in null mutant mice lacking neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene (nNOS(-/-)) 6 h and 4 weeks after 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. The increase in 5-bromodeoxyurldine positive cells in 7-nitroindazole-treated mice was accompanied by activation of cyclic AMP response element binding protein phosphorylation in the dentate gyrus. Pretreatment with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 fully abolished the effects of 7-nitroindazole on neurogenesis and cyclic AMP response element binding protein phosphorylation. Furthermore, neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibition significantly enhanced the survival of newborn cells and the number of 5-bromodeoxyuridine positive/NeuN positive cells in the dentate gyrus. These results indicate that neuronal nitric oxide synthasederived nitric oxide suppresses neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus, in which N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor functions and cyclic AMP response element binding protein phosphorylation may be involved. (c) 2006 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据