4.5 Article

Increased expression of the renin-angiotensin system and mast cell density but not of angiotensin-converting enzyme II in late stages of human heart failure

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 1117-1125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.04.012

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) contributes to the progression of left ventricular dysfunction. A novel human homologue of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), named ACE2, has been described but its role in human heart failure (HF) has not been elucidated. Besides, there is controversy as to whether the major angiotensin II-forming-activity in heart is ACE or chymase released from mast cells. Furthermore, long-term blockade of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis has been shown to increase ACE activity. To assess the locally activated vasoactive mediators that may contribute to the ventricular deterioration process, we sought to simultaneously analyze their expression in failing hearts. Methods: We analyzed left ventricular biopsies from 30 patients with heart failure undergoing heart transplantation and 12 organ donors. The mRNA levels of ACE, ACE2, chymase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction and mast cell density was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The mRNA levels of the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and the brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were also quantified as controls. Results: There was higher ACE and chymase mRNA expression and mast cell density in failing than in control myocardium and no changes in ACE2 expression were detected. eNOS mRNA levels were lower in failing hearts. Both ANP and BNP expression were higher in pathological than in control samples. Conclusions: These data document a decompensation of vasoactive systems that may contribute to the progressive impairment of the myocardial function in HF. On the other hand, ACE2 mRNA expression is not altered in human end-stage

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据