4.7 Article

Salvage chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide for recurrent temozolomide-refractory anaplastic astrocytoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 172-179

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21582

关键词

cyclophosphamide; temozolomide; recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma; efficacy; toxicity

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. A prospective Phase II study of cyclophosphamide (CYC) was conducted in adult patients with recurrent temozolomide-refractory anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) with a primary objective of evaluating 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS. Forty patients (28 men, 12 women) ages 26-57 years (median, 43 yrs) with neuro radiographically recurrent AA were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery and involved-field radiotherapy. Additionally, all patients were treated with temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy after radiotherapy. All patients were treated at recurrence with CYC administered intravenously on 2 consecutive days (750 mg/m(2)/day) every 4 weeks (operationally defined as a single cycle). Neurologic and neuro radiographic evaluation were performed every 8 weeks. RESULTS. All patients were evaluable. A total of 215 cycles of CYC (median, 4 cycles; range 2-12 cycles) was administered. CYC-related toxicity included alopecia (all patients, 100%), anemia (5, 12.5%), thrombocytopenia (6, 15%), and neutropenia (8, 20%). Four (10%) patients required transfusion. Nine patients (22.5%) (95% confidence interval 195% CI], 11%-39%) demonstrated a neuroradiographic partial response, 16 patients (40.0%) (95% CI, 25%-57%) demonstrated stable disease, and 15 patients (37.5%) (95% CI, 23%-54%) had progressive disease after 2 cycles of CYC. Time to tumor progression ranged from 2-19 months (median, 4 mos; 95% CI, 2-6 mos). Survival ranged from 2-26 months (median, 8 mos; 95% CI, 6-10 mos). The 6-month and 12-month PFS was 30% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. CYC demonstrated modest efficacy with acceptable toxicity in this cohort of adult patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma, all of whom had failed prior TMZ chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据