4.5 Article

Evidence that hydrogen sulfide exerts antinociceptive effects in the gastrointestinal tract by activating K-ATP channels

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.091595

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen sulfide ( H 2 S) functions as a neuromodulator, but whether it modulates visceral perception and pain is unknown. Cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine-gamma-lyase (CSE) mediate enzymatic generation of H2S in mammalian cells. Here we have investigated the role of H 2 S in modulating nociception to colorectal distension, a model that mimics some features of the irritable bowel syndrome. Four graded (0.4 - 1.6 ml of water) colorectal distensions (CRDs) were produced in conscious rats (healthy and postcolitic), and rectal nociception was assessed by measuring the behavioral response during CRD. Healthy rats were administered with sodium hydrogen sulfide (NaHS) (as a source of H2S), L-cysteine, or vehicle. In a second model, we investigated nociception to CRD in rats recovering from a chemically induced acute colitis. We found that CBS and CSE are expressed in the colon and spinal cord. Treating rats with NaHS resulted in a dose-dependent attenuation of CRD-induced nociception with the maximal effect at 60 mu mol/kg (p < 0.05). Administration of L-cysteine, a CSE/CBS substrate, reduced rectal sensitivity to CRD (p < 0.05). NaHS-induced antinociception was reversed by glibenclamide, a ATP-sensitive K+( K-ATP) channel inhibitor, and N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (L-NAME), a nitric-oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor. The antinociceptive effect of NaHS was maintained during the resolution of colon inflammation induced by intrarectal administration of a chemical irritant. In summary, these data show that H 2 S inhibits nociception induced by CRD in both healthy and postcolitic rats. This effect is mediated by K-ATP channels and NO. H2S-releasing drugs might be beneficial in treating painful intestinal disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据