4.2 Article

Detailed study of the ring-opening metathesis polymerization of norbornene bearing a five- or six-membered ring cyclic carbonate along with volume expansion

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.21073

关键词

metathesis; ring-opening polymerization; ring-opening metathesis polymerization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of norbornene derivatives bearing five- or six-membered cyclic carbonate (2 or 3) was carried out with a typical ruthenium catalyst [bis(tricyclohexylphosphine)benzylidene ruthenium(IV) dichloride], the so-called first-generation Grubbs catalyst, under various reaction conditions, to smoothly obtain the corresponding polyalkenamers (5 and 6) along with volume expansion. The number-average molecular weights (M-n'S), 10% weight loss decomposition temperatures, glass-transition temperatures (T-g's), and volume expansion ratios of the resulting products depended on the polymerization conditions. The degree of volume expansion was mainly affected by M-n, T-g, and the cis/trans configuration of the exocyclic double bonds of the resulting polymers. The volume expansion was confirmed to specifically occur during the polymerization of the monomer bearing cyclic carbonate moieties, and similar ROMPS of monomers without cyclic carbonate, such as norbornene itself, the monomer 5,5-bis(methoxymethyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene, and the monomer endo-N-methylbicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-2,3-dicarboxylimide, proceeded along with volume shrinkage. Furthermore, an investigation of another type of polymerization, a vinyl-type one, of monomer 2 suggested that the volume expansion specifically took place in the ring-opening type of polymerization. In addition, the Sc(OTf)(3)-mediated cationic ring-opening reaction of the cyclic carbonate moiety of polyalkenamer 5 smoothly proceeded along with volume expansion or nearly zero volume shrinkage to yield the corresponding networked polymer. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据