4.5 Article

The anterior cruciate ligament deficiency as a model of brain plasticity

期刊

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 645-650

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.01.063

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a plausible mechanism for the development of brain plastic changes due to a peripheral joint injury, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Evidence for the hypothesis is based on mainly three indications derived from the literature review: (a) the existence of two different categories of ACL patients, the copers and non-copers, presenting different features of functional deficiencies, (b) the demand of a sufficient post-traumatic time (more than 6 months) for the dysfunction development and (c) the fact that the dysfunction is not limited to the injured limb but also concerns the non-injured one. Considering the fact that ACL contains mechanoreceptors, which inform the central nervous system (CNS) about joint sense position and kinaesthesia, it can be suggested that this kind of injury might be regarded as a neurophysiological dysfunction, not being a simple musculoskeletal injury. The rupture of the ACL could lead to the cessation/depletion or differentiation of the ascending afferent pathway from the injured joint towards CNS, inducing to the joint de-afferentation and consequently CNS reorganization and joint de-efferentation. In case of presumable evidence of the proposed hypothesis, its clinical application could concern several aspects of the intervention procedures. For example, a number of clinical findings, such as the functional differences presented between two separate clinical groups of patients (copers and non-copers) could be justified or the rehabilitation strategies might have to be revised, provided that certain therapeutic components have influence on facilitating brain plastic changes that induce to beneficial functional outcomes. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据