4.6 Article

Unmetabolized folic acid in plasma is associated with reduced natural killer cell cytotoxicity among postmenopausal women

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 136, 期 1, 页码 189-194

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/136.1.189

关键词

carcinogenesis; folic acid; immune function; natural killer cells

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA069334, T32CA080416] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA69334, T32 CA80416] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Folic acid (FA) supplements and food fortification are used to prevent neural tube defects and to lower plasma homocysteine. Through exposure to food fortification and vitamin supplement use, large populations in the United States and elsewhere have an unprecedented high FA intake. We evaluated dietary and supplemental intakes of folate and FA in relation to an index of immune function, natural killer cell (NK) cytotoxicity, among 105 healthy, postmenopausal women. Among women with a diet low in folate (< 233 mu g/d), those who used FA-containing supplements had significantly greater NK cytotoxicity (P = 0.01). However, those who consumed a folate-rich diet and in addition used FA supplements > 400 mu g/d had reduced NK cytotoxicity compared with those consuming a low-folate diet and no supplements (P = 0.02). Prompted by this observation, we assessed the presence of unmetabolized FA in plasma as a biochemical marker of excess FA. Unmetabolized folic acid was detected in 78% of plasma samples from fasting participants. We found an inverse relation between the presence of unmetabolized FA in plasma and NK cytotoxicity. NK cytotoxicity was similar to 23% lower among women with detectable folic acid (P = 0.04). This inverse relation was stronger among women >= 60 y old and more pronounced with increasing unmetabolized FA concentrations (P-trend = 0.002). Because of the increased intake of FA in many countries, our findings highlight the need for further studies on the effect of long-term high FA intake on immune function and health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据