4.2 Article

Evaluation of density-dependent processes and green turtle Chelonia mydas hatchling production at Tortuguero, Costa Rica

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 283-293

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps326283

关键词

green turtles; Chelonia mydas; density-dependent effects; density-independent effects; hatchling production; carrying capacity; Tortuguero; Costa Rica

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of density-dependent processes in sea turtle populations remains largely unknown. This study quantified density-dependent and density-independent processes that underlie hatchling production in the green turtle nesting population at Tortuguero, Costa Rica, and estimated current mean hatchling output and potential carrying capacity of Tortuguero beach for hatchlings and nesting females. Density-dependent effects of nest destruction by nesting females and coatis were evaluated in the 2000 nesting season along the 28.8 km nesting beach. To quantify factors affecting hatchling production, the fates of nests were monitored in twelve 50 m long study plots. Density-dependent factors included nest destruction by nesting females and predation by coatis, whereas density-independent factors included beach erosion, beach flooding, and below-beach-surface destruction by crabs, ants, microbes, and plant roots. Calculations indicated that between 5 and 6 million hatchlings are currently produced, while a simulation model suggested that at carrying capacity, 6 to 10 times as many hatchlings could be produced by more than 600 000 nesting females. The current mean number of females nesting at Tortuguero is between 3 and 4% of the population that is estimated to nest at carrying capacity. This estimate is consistent with previous estimates that modern day populations of Caribbean green turtles represent only 3 to 7% of pre-exploitation levels. The hatchling production model is applicable to other beaches and sea turtle species, and provides a framework to evaluate recovery goals for sea turtles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据