4.3 Review

Transcription factor GATA-1 and Down syndrome leukemogenesis

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 986-997

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428190500485810

关键词

acute megakaryocytic leukemia; transient myeloproliferative disorder; megakaryopoiesis; trisomy 21

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA092308, R01CA101774] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA101774, R01 CA101774-04, R01-CA092308, R01-CA101774] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in transcription factors constitute one means by which normal hematopoietic progenitors are converted to leukemic stem cells. Recently, acquired mutations in the megakaryocytic regulator GATA1 have been found in essentially all cases of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMkL) in children with Down syndrome and in the closely related malignancy transient myeloproliferative disorder. In all cases, mutations in GATA1 lead to the expression of a shorter isoform of GATA-1, named GATA-1s. Because GATA-1s retains both DNA binding zinc fingers, but is missing the N-terminal transactivation domain, it has been predicted that the inability of GATA-1s to regulate its normal class of megakaryocytic target genes is the mechanism by which mutations in GATA1 contribute to the disease. Indeed, several recent reports have confirmed that GATA-1s fails to properly regulate the growth of megakaryocytic precursors, likely through aberrant transcriptional regulation. Although the specific target genes of GATA-1 mis-regulated by GATA-1s that drive this abnormal growth remain undefined, multiple candidate genes have been identified via gene array studies. Finally, the inability of GATA-1s to promote expression of important metabolic genes, such as cytadine deaminase, likely contributes to the remarkable hypersensitivity of AMkL blasts to cytosine arabinoside. Future studies to define the entire class of genes dysregulated by mutations in GATA1 will provide important insights into the etiology of these malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据