4.7 Article

Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experiment

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
卷 62, 期 1, 页码 103-115

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.028

关键词

gender; ageism; health inequalities; primary care; decision-making; UK/US; randomised experiment

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG016747] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG-16747] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous studies examine inequalities in health by gender, age, class and race, but few address the actions of primary care doctors. This factorial experiment examined how four patient characteristics impact on primary care doctors' decisions regarding coronary heart disease (CHD). Primary care doctors viewed a video-vignette of a scripted consultation where the patient presented with standardised symptoms of CHD. Videotapes were identical apart from varying patients' gender, age (55 versus 75), class and race, thereby removing any confounding factors from the social context of the consultation or other aspects of patients' symptomatology or behaviour. A probability sample of 256 primary care doctors in the UK and US viewed these video-vignettes in a randomised experimental design. Gender of patient significantly influenced doctors' diagnostic and management activities. However, there was no influence of social class or race. and no evidence of ageism in doctors' behaviour. Women were asked fewer questions, received fewer examinations and had fewer diagnostic tests ordered for CHD. 'Gendered ageism' was suggested, since midlife women were asked fewest questions and prescribed least medication appropriate for CHD. Primary care doctors' behaviour differed significantly by patients' gender, suggesting doctors' actions may contribute to gender inequalities in health. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据