4.5 Article

Characterization of the putative operon containing arylamine N-acetyltransferase (nat) in Mycobacterium bovis BCG

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 181-192

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04945.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G9901077] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G9901077] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis possess a single arylamine N-acetyltransferase whose gene is predicted to occur within a six-gene operon. Deletion of the nat gene caused an extended lag phase in M. bovis BCG and a cell morphology associated with an altered pattern of cell wall mycolates. Analysis of cDNA from M. bovis BCG shows that during in vitro growth all the genes in the putative nat operon are expressed and the open reading frames are contiguous, supporting the existence of an operon. Two genes in the operon, Mb3599c and Mb3600c, are predicted to encode homologues of enzymes annotated as a 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl 1,2-dioxygenase (bphC5) and a 2-hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoate hydrolase (bphD2), respectively, in Rhodococcus RHA1. As predicted, M. bovis BCG cell lysates metabolized the BphC substrate 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl (2,3-DHB) to 2-hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoic acid (HOPDA), a BphD substrate, which was subsequently hydrolysed. Immunoprecipitation of the BphD homologue from these lysates led to an accumulation of HOPDA. M. bovis BCG growth on both solid and liquid media was inhibited with either 2,3-DHB or an inhibitor of BphC, 3-chlorocatechol (3-CC). In addition, incubation with 2,3-DHB affects the lipid composition of the cell wall resulting in a diminished level of mycolates and an altered cell morphology similar to the Delta nat strain. We propose the enzymes encoded by the putative operon have a similar endogenous role to that of the NAT enzyme and are part of a pathway important for cell wall synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据