4.6 Article

Local group dwarf elliptical galaxies. I. Mapping the dynamics of NGC 205 beyond the tidal radius

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 131, 期 1, 页码 332-342

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/498686

关键词

galaxies : dwarf; galaxies : individual (NGC 205); galaxies : interactions; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NGC 205 is the nearest example of a dwarf elliptical galaxy and the prototype of this enigmatic galaxy class. Photometric evidence suggests that NGC 205, a close satellite of the M31 galaxy, is tidally interacting with its parent galaxy. We present stellar radial velocity measurements out to a projected radius of 200 (5 kpc) in NGC 205 based on Keck DEIMOS multislit spectroscopic observations of 725 individual red giant branch stars. Our kinematic measurements extend from the center out to 6 times the effective radius of NGC 205, well past the expected tidal radius. The contamination in our kinematic sample from M31 field stars is estimated to be a few percent based on maximum likelihood fits to the distribution of stars in position-velocity space. We measure a maximum major-axis rotation speed for the body of NGC 205 of 11 +/- 5 km s(-1) and note that this is based on observing a definite turnover in the rotation curve; this is the first dE galaxy in which the maximum rotation velocity has been measured. Combined with the velocity dispersion, we conclude that NGC 205 is supported by a combination of rotation and anisotropic velocity dispersion. At a major-axis distance of 4.'5 (1 kpc), the velocity profile of NGC205 turns over; stars beyond this radius are moving counter to the rotation of the inner part of the galaxy. The turnover radius is coincident with the onset of isophotal twisting and the estimated tidal radius, suggesting that the outer kinematics of NGC 205 is dominated by gravitational interactions with the nearby M31 galaxy. The motion of stars beyond a radius of similar to 4.'5 implies that NGC 205 is in a prograde encounter with its parent galaxy, M31.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据