4.7 Article

SPS processing of bismuth-layer structured ferroelectric ceramics yielding highly textured microstructures

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 26, 期 15, 页码 3233-3239

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.08.019

关键词

sintering; grain growth; SPS; Bi4Ti3O12; CaBi2Nb2O9

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spark plasma sintering (SPS) behaviour of nano-sized Bi4Ti3O12 (BIT) and micron-sized CaBi2Nb2O9 (CBNO) powders is described. The densification process of both powders is very rapid, i.e. the densification occurs within a very narrow time interval (2-3 min using a heating rate of 100 degrees C mint and a pressure of 50 MPa). The BIT powder exhibits a lower densitication onset temperature (similar to 650 degrees C) and higher maximum shrinkage rate (8.9 x 10(-3) s(-1) at 780 degrees C) than that of the CBNO powder (similar to 825 degrees C and 4.5 x 10(-3) s(-1) at 950 degrees C). Isothermal compaction studies revealed that fully dense nano-sized BIT compacts could be obtained within the temperature region 750 degrees C < T-iso < 850 degrees C while for T-iso > 850 degrees C compacts containing elongated platelet grains are formed. A new preparation route to produce highly textured compacts is described in detail. Appropriate pre-forms are prepared by spark plasma sintering (SPS) and these fully dense compacts are subject to superplastic deformation in the SPS unit to achieve a total compressive strain of similar to 60%. This strain was achieved within a period of 1.5 min and with a maximum strain rates of 1.1 x 10(-2) s(-1) achieved at similar to 840 degrees C and 1.3 x 10(-2) s(-1) at 1020 degrees C for the BIT and CBNO compacts, respectively. The X-ray studies showed that the Lotgering orientation factors of grains in the deformed BIT and CBNO compacts are 99% and 70%. The formation of highly textured compacts is suggested to be governed by a superplastic deformation-induced directional dynamic ripening mechanism. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据