4.8 Article

Inhibition of the Sodium-Potassium-Chloride Cotransporter Isoform-1 Reduces Glioma Invasion

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 70, 期 13, 页码 5597-5606

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4666

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Resources
  2. Neuroscience Blueprint Core Grant [NS57098]
  3. [NIH-RO1-036692]
  4. [RO1-031234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant gliomas metastasize throughout the brain by infiltrative cell migration into peritumoral areas. Invading cells undergo profound changes in cell shape and volume as they navigate extracellular spaces along blood vessels and white matter tracts. Volume changes are aided by the concerted release of osmotically active ions, most notably K+ and Cl-. Their efflux through ion channels along with obligated water causes rapid cell shrinkage. Suitable ionic gradients must be established and maintained through the activity of ion transport systems. Here, we show that the Sodium-Potassium-Chloride Cotransporter Isoform-1 (NKCC1) provides the major pathway for Cl-accumulation in glioma cells. NKCC1 localizes to the leading edge of invading processes, and pharmacologic inhibition using the loop diuretic bumetanide inhibits in vitro Transwell migration by 25% to 50%. Short hairpin RNA knockdowns of NKCC1 yielded a similar inhibition and a loss of bumetanide-sensitive cell volume regulation. A loss of NKCC1 function did not affect cell motility in two-dimensional assays lacking spatial constraints but manifested only when cells had to undergo volume changes during migration. Intracranial implantation of human gliomas into severe combined immunodeficient mice showed a marked reduction in cell invasion when NKCC1 function was disrupted genetically or by twice daily injection of the Food and Drug Administration-approved NKCC1 inhibitor Bumex. These data support the consideration of Bumex as adjuvant therapy for patients with high-grade gliomas. Cancer Res; 70(13); 5597-606. (C)2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据