4.5 Article

Biomechanical assessment of tissue retrieved after in vivo cartilage defect repair: tensile modulus of repair tissue and integration with host cartilage

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 138-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.016

关键词

cartilage; repair; tissue engineering; biomechanics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Failure to restore the mechanical properties of tissue at the repair site and its interface with host cartilage is a common problem in tissue engineering procedures to repair cartilage defects. Quantitative in vitro studies have helped elucidate mechanisms underlying processes leading to functional biomechanical changes. However, biomechanical assessment of tissue retrieved from in vivo studies of cartilage defect repair has been limited to compressive tests. Analysis of integration following in vivo repair has relied on qualitative histological methods. The objectives of this study were to develop a quantitative biomechanical method to assess (1) the tensile modulus of repair tissue and (2) its integration in vivo, as well as determine whether supplementation of transplanted chondrocytes with IGF-I affected these mechanical properties. Osteochondral blocks were obtained from a previous 8 month study on the effects of IGF-I on chondrocyte transplantation in the equine model. Tapered test specimens were prepared from osteochondral blocks containing the repair/native tissue interface and adjacently located blocks of intact native tissue. Specimens were then tested in uniaxial tension. The tensile modulus of repair tissue averaged 0.65 MPa, compared to the average of 5.2 MPa measured in intact control samples. Integration strength averaged 1.2MPa, nearly half the failure strength of intact cartilage samples, 2.7 MPa. IGF-I treatment had no detectable effects on these mechanical properties. This represents the first quantitative biomechanical investigation of the tensile properties of repair tissue and its integration strength in an in vivo joint defect environment. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据