4.3 Article

Detection of inflammatory markers in stools from patients with irritable bowel syndrome and collagenous colitis

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 54-59

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365520510023909

关键词

collagenous colitis; cytokine; faeces; inflammation; inflammatory bowel disease; irritable bowel syndrome; stool

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and collagenous colitis (CC) share chronically recurring symptoms of altered bowel habits associated with abdominal pain or discomfort. The aims of the present study were to investigate whether inflammatory markers could be detected in faeces from patients with IBS and CC, and to elucidate whether such analyses could be used as non-invasive tools to distinguish between these disorders. Material and methods. Stool samples were obtained from 18 patients with CC, 46 patients with IBS and 20 healthy controls (HC). Eosinophil protein X (EPX), myeloperoxidase (MPO), tryptase, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) were measured in supernatants from processed faeces using immunoassays. Results. EPX levels were enhanced in faeces from CC patients (median 3.8 mu g/g (0.47-16.2)) compared to patients with IBS (0.44 mu g/g (0.25-1.8)), p<0.001, and HC (0.46 mu g/g (0.21-1.3)), p<0.001. In addition, MPO was increased in CC patients (11.7 mu g/g (2.0-124)) compared to IBS patients (1.7 mu g/g (0.81-5.2)), p<0.01, and HC (2.5 mu g/g (1.1-6.3)), p<0.05. Tryptase was found in 9/18 patients with CC, 6/46 with IBS and 1/19 HC. IL-1 beta was only enhanced in 2/11 CC patients and TNF alpha was not detected in any sample. Conclusions. Increased levels of EPX, MPO and tryptase were observed in stools from collagenous colitis patients, whereas the levels in IBS patients did not differ from healthy controls. Our data suggest that faecal markers could be used as part of the clinical work-up to determine which patients should be biopsied and evaluated for collagenous colitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据