4.6 Article

Ultrasonic properties of sedimentary rocks: effect of pressure, saturation, frequency and microcracks

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 164, 期 1, 页码 246-258

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-246X.2005.02826.X

关键词

attenuation; elastic wave theory; fluids in rocks; laboratory measurements; moduli; sediments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seismic velocities and attenuations are influenced by lithology, porosity and permeability as well as the kind and quantity of the pore fluids. The microstructure of rocks is another important factor influencing seismic properties. This influence can be used to investigate the pressure-dependent closure of microcracks. For this purpose, velocities and attenuations of P and S waves have been determined at ultrasonic frequencies in three different rocks (vacuum dry and partially saturated with water) as a function of hydrostatic pressure up to 200 MPa. A new combined model has been developed. With this model an explicit description of the microstructure [local fluid flow (LF)] and macrostructure (Gassmann effect, global fluid flow) is possible. Assuming a patchy saturation (i.e. inhomogeneous distribution of the fluid in the pores) and modulus reduction, both the saturation-dependent measurements and the pressure-dependent data can be explained. The modelling and the phenomenological interpretation of the data gained under increasing hydrostatic pressure yields consistent results concerning the amount of crack closure as well as the range in which crack closure appears: in high-porosity sandstones (Bentheimer and Obernkirchner Sandstone) a strong closure of cracks already with a small increase of pressure must be concluded. In a low-porosity Harzer Greywacke a significantly lower closure of cracks can be concluded within the pressure range of 0-100 MPa. It is shown, however, that there must be open cracks in all rocks even under elevated hydrostatic pressure, resulting in a measurable effect due to LF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据