4.5 Article

The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 931-938

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.012

关键词

mechanical properties; bone mineral; collagen; femur; three-point bend

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG022044] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG022044] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the effects of dehydration on the mechanical behavior of cortical bone are known, the underlying mechanisms for such effects are not clear. We hypothesize that the interactions of water with the collagen and mineral phases each have a unique influence on mechanical behavior. To study this, strength, toughness, and stiffness were measured with three-point bend specimens made from the mid-diaphysis of human cadaveric femurs and divided into six test groups: control (hydrated), drying in a vacuum oven at room temperature (21 degrees C) for 30 nim and at 21, 50, 70, or 110 degrees C for 4 h. The experimental data indicated that water loss significantly increased with each increase in drying condition. Bone strength increased with a 5% loss of water by weight, which was caused by drying at 21 degrees C for 4 h. With water loss exceeding 9%, caused by higher drying temperatures (>= 70 degrees C), strength actually decreased. Drying at 21 degrees C (irrespective of time in vacuum) significantly decreased bone toughness through a loss of plasticity. However, drying at 70 degrees C and above caused toughness to decrease through decreases in strength and fracture strain. Stiffness linearly increased with an increase in water loss. From an energy perspective, the water mineral interaction is removed at higher temperatures than the water-collagen interaction. Therefore, we speculate that loss of water in the collagen phase decreases the toughness of bone, whereas loss of water associated with the mineral phase decreases both bone strength and toughness. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据