4.8 Article

Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Is a Regulator of Ovarian Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 1469-1476

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2678

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. UVA Cancer Center
  2. UVA Womens Oncology Research Fund
  3. ACS Institutional Research Grant
  4. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund, National Ovarian Cancer Coalition-Northern Virginia Division
  5. Marsha Rivkin Center for Ovarian Cancer Research (J.K. Slack-Davis).

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ovarian cancers metastasize by attaching to and invading through the mesothelium, a single layer of mesothelial cells lining the peritoneal cavity. The presence of invasive peritoneal metastases is associated with a poor prognosis for ovarian cancer (5-year survival <25%). Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) is a cell surface receptor that mediates leukocyte attachment and extravasation across endothelial and mesothelial monolayers at sites of inflammation. Membranous VCAM-1 expression was observed on the mesothelium of 13 of 14 women Kith ovarian cancer compared with 6 of 15 who were cancer-free. Using a cell culture model system of mesothelial invasion, highly tumorigenic SKOV-3 and ES-2 cells were 2.5 to 3 times more efficient in transmigration through the mesothelial monolayer compared with poorly tumorigenic OVCAR-3 cells. Blocking antibodies to, or small interfering RNA knockdown of, VCAM-1 or its ligand 0401 integrin significantly decreased, but did not completely inhibit, transmigration of SKOV-3 cells through mesothelial monolayers. Furthermore, using a mouse model of ovarian cancer metastasis, treatment with VCAM-1 function-blocking antibodies decreased tumor burden and increased survival. Together, these observations implicate VCAM-1-alpha(4)beta(1) integrin interactions in the regulation of ovarian cancer cell mesothelial invasion and metastatic progression and offer the possibility of novel therapeutic targets. [Cancer Res 2009;69(4):1469-76]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据