4.8 Article

Potentiating Endogenous Antitumor Immunity to Prostate Cancer through Combination Immunotherapy with CTLA4 Blockade and GM-CSF

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 609-615

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3529

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH/NCI [P50 CA89520]
  2. NCI [1101 CA102303]
  3. ULI [RR024131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CTL-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) is a costimulatory molecule expressed on activated T cells that delivers an inhibitory signal to these T cells. CTLA4 blockade with antibody treatment has been shown to augment antitumor immunity in animal models and is being developed as a treatment for cancer patients. As has been seen in preclinical models, combining CTLA4 blockade and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-based immunotherapies can enhance the antitumor efficacy of this approach. We therefore examined whether CTLA4 blockade could be combined with GM-CSF administration. We treated 24 patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer in a phase I trial where sequential cohorts were treated with increasing doses of ipilimumab, a fully human anti-CTLA4 antibody. Study subjects also received s.c. injections of GM-CSF at a fixed dose. Of the six patients treated at the highest dose level, three had confirmed PSA declines of >50%, including one patient that had a partial response in visceral metastases. Expansion of activated, circulating CD25(+) CD69(+) CD8(+) T cells occurred more frequently at higher doses of treatment and was greater in magnitude than was seen in patients who received the same doses of either ipilimumab or GM-CSF alone. By screening sera with protein arrays, we showed that our treatment can induce antibody responses to NY-ESO-1. These results show that this combination immunotherapy can induce the expansion not only of activated effector CD8 T cells in vivo but also of T cells that are specific for known tumor-associated antigens from the endogenous immune repertoire. [Cancer Res 2009;69(2):609-15]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据