4.7 Article

Intensive care acquired infection is an independent risk factor for hospital mortality: a prospective cohort study

期刊

CRITICAL CARE
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/cc4902

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection on hospital mortality. Methods Patients with a longer than 48 hour stay in a mixed 10 bed ICU in a tertiary-level teaching hospital were prospectively enrolled between May 2002 and June 2003. Risk factors for hospital mortality were analyzed with a logistic regression model. Results Of 335 patients, 80 developed ICU-acquired infection. Among the patients with ICU-acquired infections, hospital mortality was always higher, regardless of whether or not the patients had had infection on admission ( infection on admission group (IAG), 35.6% versus 17%, p = 0.008; and no-IAG, 25.7% versus 6.1%, p = 0.023). In IAG ( n = 251), hospital stay was also longer in the presence of ICU-acquired infection ( median 31 versus 16 days, p < 0.001), whereas in no-IAG ( n = 84), hospital stay was almost identical with and without the presence of ICU-acquired infection ( 18 versus 17 days). In univariate analysis, the significant risk factors for hospital mortality were: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score > 20, sequential organ failure assessment ( SOFA) score > 8, ICU-acquired infection, age >= 65, community-acquired pneumonia, malignancy or immunosuppressive medication, and ICU length of stay > 5 days. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ICU-acquired infection remained an independent risk factor for hospital mortality after adjustment for APACHE II score and age ( odds ratio ( OR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0 - 7.9)) and SOFA score and age ( OR 2.7 ( 95% CI: 2.9 - 7.6)). Conclusion ICU-acquired infection was an independent risk factor for hospital mortality even after adjustment for the APACHE II or SOFA scores and age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据