4.8 Article

Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor 17-Dimethylaminoethylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin Enhances EphA2+ Tumor Cell Recognition by Specific CD8+ T Cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 17, 页码 6995-7003

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4511

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA114071, P50 CA121973]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

EphA2, a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family, is commonly expressed by a broad range of cancer types, where its level of (over)expression correlates with poor clinical outcome. Because tumor cell expressed EphA2 is a non-mutated self protein, specific CD8(+) T cells are subject to self-tolerance mechanisms and typically exhibit only moderate-to-low functional avidity, rendering them marginally competent to recognize EphA2(+) tumor cells in vitro or in vivo. We have recently reported that the ability of specific CD8(+) T cells to recognize EphA2(+) tumor cells can be augmented after the cancer cells are pretreated with EphA2 agonists that promote proteasomal degradation and up-regulated expression of EphA2/class I complexes on the tumor cell membrane. In the current study, we show that treatment of EphA2(+) tumor cells with the irreversible heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, 17dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG), similarly enhances their recognition by EphA2-specific CD8(+) T-cell lines and clones in vitro via a mechanism that is dependent on proteasome and transporter-associated protein function as well as the retrotranslocation of EphA2 into the tumor cytoplasm. When 17-DMAG and agonist anti-EphA2 monoclonal antibodies are coapplied, T-cell recognition of tumor cells is further increased over that observed for either agent alone. These studies suggest that EphA2 represents a novel heat shock protein 90 client protein and that the treatment of cancer patients with 17-DMAG-based pulse therapy may improve the antitumor efficacy of CD8(+) T effector cells reactive against EphA2-derived epitopes. [Cancer Res 2009;69(17):6995-7003]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据