4.8 Article

Cyclin D1 Degradation Is Sufficient to Induce G1 Cell Cycle Arrest despite Constitutive Expression of Cyclin E2 in Ovarian Cancer Cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 16, 页码 6565-6572

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0913

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. [R01 CA106713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

D- and E-type cyclins mediate G(1)-S phase cell cycle progression through activation of specific cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk) that phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (pRb), thereby alleviating repression of E2F-DP transactivation of S-phase genes. Cyclin D1 is often overexpressed in a variety of cancers and is associated with tumorigenesis and metastasis. Loss of cyclin D can cause G, arrest in some cells, but in other cellular contexts, the downstream cyclin E protein can substitute for cyclin D and facilitate G(1)-S progression. The objective of this study was to determine if a flexible heteroarotinoid anticancer compound, SHetA2, regulates cell cycle proteins and cell cycle progression in ovarian cancer cells. SHetA2 induced cyclin D1 phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and proteasomal degradation, causing G, arrest in ovarian cancer cells despite continued cyclin E2 expression and independently of p53 and glycogen synthase kinase-30. Cyclin D1 loss inhibited pRb S780 phosphorylation by cyclin D1-cdk4/6 and released p21 from cyclin D1-cdk4/6-p21 protein complexes to form cyclin E2-cdk2-p21 complexes, which repressed phosphorylation of pRb S612 by cyclin E2-cdk2 and ultimately E2F-DP transcriptional activity. G, arrest was prevented by overexpression or preventing degradation of cyclin D1 but not by restoration of pRb S612 phosphorylation through p21 knockdown. In conclusion, we show that loss of cyclin D1 in ovarian cancer cells treated with SHetA2 is sufficient to induce G, cell cycle arrest and this strategy is not impeded by the presence of cyclin E2. Therefore, cyclin D1 is a sufficient therapeutic target in ovarian cancer cells. [Cancer Res 2009;69(16):6565-72]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据