4.5 Article

Markers of inflammation, Vitamin E and peripheral nervous system function - The InCHIANTI study

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1280-1288

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.07.004

关键词

inflammation; Vitamin E; peripheral nervous system; aging

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 AG999999] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [R01 MD009164, 263MD821336, 263MD916413] Funding Source: Medline
  3. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [R01MD009164] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background:: Aging of the peripheral nervous system is associated with several morphologic and functional changes, including a decrease of the nerve conduction velocity. There is evidence that these changes contribute to age-related-decline in muscle strength, sensory discrimination, and autonomic responses. The aim of this study was to characterize the decline in nerve conduction velocity in the peripheral nervous system over the aging process and to identify factors that, independent of age, affect nerve conduction velocity. Methods:: We measured motor nerve conduction velocity of the right superficial peroneal nerve using a standard neurophysiologic technique in a population-based sample of subjects aged between 20 and 103 years old enrolled in the InCHIANTI study. Results:: Average conduction velocities in the peripheral nerve decreased linearly with age in both sexes. We found that diabetes, cognitive impairment, uric acid, sIL-6R and alpha-tocopherol were significant predictors of nerve conduction velocity independently of the potential confounding effect of age, sex, sex x age interaction term, height, lymphocytes, neutrophils number, alpha 1 and alpha 2-globulin serum protein. Conclusions:: Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that inflammation and inadequate antioxidant defenses are associated with accelerated decline of nerve conduction velocity over the aging process. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据