4.5 Article

The relationship between incidental learning and multi-dimensional schizotypy as measured by the Oxford-Liverpool inventory of feelings and experiences (O-LIFE)

期刊

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 385-394

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.010

关键词

incidental learning; O-LIFE; positive-schizotypy; unusual experiences; over-inclusiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a study carried out to investigate the relationship between incidental learning and multi-dimensional schizotypy as measured by the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE; Mason, Claridge, & Jackson, 1995). Whilst Jones, Gray, and Hemsley (1992) found incidental recall to be positively correlated with the 'unusual perceptual experiences' factor of Hewitt and Claridge's (1989) three factor solution to the Schizotypal Personality Scale (STA; Claridge & Broks, 1984), research in this area is generally limited. Further to the development of the O-LIFE, a reliable measure of multi-dimensional schizotypy, the aim of the current study was to re-investigate the relationship between schizotypy and incidental learning. Seventy-five undergraduate students completed the O-LIFE alongside a task for incidental learning and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI; Wechsler, 1999). Participants were dichotomised into low and high schizotypy scoring groups and results revealed that those scoring highly on the Unusual Experiences (positive-schziotypy) scale of the O-LIFE demonstrated higher rates of incidental recall than did the low Unusual Experiences scoring group. No differences in incidental recall were observed on the other dimensions of schizotypy or on intelligence. These findings are one of the first reports of the relationship between incidental learning and the O-LIFE scales and are consistent with the wider literature, and point to one of the important cognitive correlates of high schizotypy, namely overinclusiveness of associative relations. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据