4.3 Article

Effects of underfill materials on the reliability of low-K flip-chip packaging

期刊

MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 155-163

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2005.05.001

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliability of low-K flip-chip packaging has become a critical issue owing to the low strength and poor adhesion qualities of the low-K dielectric material when compared with that Of SiO2 or fluorinated silicate glass (FSG). The underfill must protect the solder bumps and the low-K chip from cracking and delamination. However, the material properties of underfill are contrary to those required for preventing solder bumps and low-K chip from cracking and delamination. This study describes the systematic methodologies for how to specify the adequate underfill materials for low-K flip-chip packaging. The structure of the test vehicle is seven copper layers with a low-K dielectric constant value of 2.7-2.9, produced by the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. Initially, the adhesion and the flow test of the underfill were evaluated, and then the low-K chip and the bumps stress were determined using the finite element method. The preliminary screened underfill candidates were acquired by means of the underfill adhesion and flow test, and balancing the low-K chip and the bumps stress simulation results. Next, the low-K chips were assembled with these preliminary screened underfills. All the flip-chip packaging specimens underwent the reliability test in order to evaluate the material properties of the underfill affecting the flip-chip packaging stress. In addition, the failed samples are subjected to failure analysis to verify the failure mechanism. The results of this study indicate that, of the underfill materials investigated, those with a glass transition temperature (T-g) and a Young's modulus of approximately 70-80 degrees C and 8-10 GPa, respectively, are optimum for low-K flip-chip packaging with eutectic solder bumps. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据