4.5 Article

A single-surface electrochemical biosensor for the detection of DNA triplet repeat expansion

期刊

ELECTROANALYSIS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 141-151

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.200503379

关键词

DNA hybridization; electrochemical biosensor; enzyme-linked assay; trinucleotide repeat expansion; neurodegenerative diseases; osmium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular diagnostics of inherited neurodegenerative disorders such as fragile X syndrome, myotonic dystrophy or Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is based on analysis of the length of trinucleotide repetitive sequences in certain loci of genoimc DNA. The current methods employ PCR and electrophoretic determination of the amplified DNA fragment size. We have recently shown that length of a triplet repetitive DNA sequence can be determined using a double-surface electrochemical technique involving multiple hybridizaton of the expanded triplet repeat with short labeled reporter probe (spanning several trinucleotides). Here we propose a single-surface sensor employing an analogous principle. Target DNA (tDNA) is adsorbed onto surface of a carbon (pyrolytic graphite or screen-printed) electrode. Biotin-labeled reporter probe (RP) is hybridized with the immobilized tDNA followed by binding of streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (ALP) Conjugate. The ALP catalyzes production of an electroactive indicator (1-naphtol) which is detected voltammetrically oil the same electrode. Signal resulting front this electrochemical enzyme-linked DNA hybridization assay is normalized to the amount of tDNA immobilized at the transducer surface either by measuring intrinsic tDNA voltammetric response, or using electrochemical labeling of the tDNA with omium tetroxide 2,2'-bipyridine complex. Detection of (GAA)(n) center dot (TTC)(n) triplet repeat expansion in nanogram quantities Of PCR-amplified tDNAs, including amplicons of patients' genomic DNA, is demonstrated. We show that our technique allow differentiation between normal and pathological alleles of X25 gene related to the FRDA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据