4.7 Article

Activation of canonical Wnt pathway promotes proliferation of retinal stem cells derived from adult mouse ciliary margin

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 95-104

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0124

关键词

retina; stem cell; Wnt; proliferation; ciliary margin; beta-catenin; GSK3 inhibitor; fibroblast growth factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adult retinal stem cells represent a possible cell source for the treatment of retinal degeneration. However, only a small number of stem cells reside in the ciliary margin. The present study aimed to promote the proliferation of adult retinal stem cells via the Wnt signaling pathway. Ciliary margin cells from 8-week-old mice were dissociated and cultured to allow sphere colony formation. Wnt3a, a glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) 3 inhibitor, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 2, and a FGF receptor inhibitor were then applied in the culture media. The primary spheres were dissociated to prepare either monolayer or secondary sphere cultures. Wnt3a increased the size of the primary spheres and the number of Ki-67-positive proliferating cells in monolayer culture. The Wnt3a-treated primary sphere cells were capable of self-renewal and gave rise to fourfold the number of secondary spheres compared with nontreated sphere cells. These cells also retained their multilineage potential to express several retinal markers under differentiating culture conditions. The Wnt3a-treated cells showed nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin, and a GSK3 inhibitor, SB216763, mimicked the mitogenic activity of Wnt3a. The proliferative effect of SB216763 was attenuated by an FGF receptor inhibitor but was enhanced by FGF2, with Ki-67-positive cells reaching over 70% of the total cells. Wnt3a and SB216763 promoted the proliferation of retinal stem cells, and this was partly dependent on FGF2 signaling. A combination of Writ and FGF signaling may provide a therapeutic strategy for in vitro expansion or in vivo activation of adult retinal stem cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据